Le jeudi 06 janvier 2005 Ã 07:16 -0800, Shahms King a Ãcrit : > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le jeudi 06 janvier 2005 Ã 09:01 -0500, Alan Cox a Ãcrit : > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:23:53PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > > > So to me we're better off just saying "the desktop should dynamically > > > > adapt to various resolutions" for example (we really need to do that > > > > anyhow, for the default configuration). > > > > > > SGI had per desktop profiles on IRIX as an option. In most respects I'd second > > > Havoc that if the desktop would just mind its own business the world will be > > > happy. That will need tools like metacity to grow up and start behaving > > > better. It would also need smarter awareness of resolution and dpi - eg if > > > I move from 1600x1200 analog to 1024x768 on the laptop tft the right move > > > for gnome-terminal is smaller fonts not 40x16 windows. > > > > ie use the real dpi setting as provided by xorg instead of forcing 96 > > dpi everywhere to match windows (and add a user-side relative zoom > > factor to take into account people with bad eyes) > > > > With modern screens you get nicer display with the highest dpi available > > instead of limiting yourself to 96 anyway. > > > > Regards, > > Sometimes the DPI returned from the DDC probe isn't accurate, > however . . . But you can always force a screen size in xorg.conf... -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
