On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:24:58PM +0000, James Hogarth wrote: > On 3 December 2015 at 22:04, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +0000, Christopher wrote: > > > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > > > working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet > > see a > > > 'letsencrypt' package. > > > Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soon might be > > very > > > useful for F23 users. > > > Does anybody have any plans to work on making the tools (and their > > > dependencies) available as an update to F23? > > > If so, I'd be willing to help test and/or review. > > > > It's in progress. See review request at > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193>. > > > > > My focus right now is F24 (aka rawhide). > > There are some dependency issues with F23 (and EPEL) which I plan to look > at once we have it in place in rawhide. > > Things like python-dialog-2.7-20 in F23 when 3.0+ is needed as one example. Nothing in the distro uses python-dialog. I think it should be fine to update. > Once letsencrypt is approved I intend to file a F23 tracker bug and block > it against any dependency missing, then talk to the relevant maintainers to > see about getting updates into F23. > > I don't know yet how feasible this is but do watch this space as it'd be a > shame not to be able to use the official client in Fedora till next year. Right. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
