On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > > Change owner(s): > * Colin Walters <walters AT redhat DOT com> > * Adam Miller <maxamillion AT gmail DOT com > > * Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek AT redhat DOT com> > * Tim Waugh <twaugh AT redhat DOT com> > * Amanda Carter <acarter AT redhat DOT com> > > Fedora currently ships a Docker base image, but Docker supports a > layering concept. There are some applications like Cockpit which we > would like to ship as layered applications. > This change will deploy the build service to support building and > delivering a set of layered Docker images, and will enable Fedora > contributors to create and maintain Dockerfiles from which those > images will be generated. > > == Detailed Description == > This change opens up an new type of official binary artifact produced > by Fedora. Currently, we produce two main types of artifacts: RPMs, > and images. The RPMs are created in Koji from specfiles in dist-git. > The images come in different formats, but have in common creation in > Koji from kickstart files — this includes the official Fedora Docker > Base Image. This change introduces a new type of image, a Docker > Layered Image, which is created from a Dockerfile and builds on top of > that base image. > > The system has five major parts: > > A command-line client — already integrated into rpkg; needs only minor > work to enable in fedpkg (there is discussion about either extending > fedpkg or adding a new fedcontainer utility) > * dist-git for Dockerfiles > * A koji plugin, containerbuild > * An OpenShift 3 backend > * A distribution mechanism; a Docker Registry > * Currently evaluating options for this > * * Pulp Crane > * * Docker Registry > > == Scope == > For the Scope of this Change please check > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service#Scope > Hi. The "Ongoing Work Tracking" link does not work. How is this different from the proposal for Fedora 23 [1]? What changed? [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1461 Thanks! Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D UTC+1 (CET) Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx