On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 09:53:40PM +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 14:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 +0000 > > James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything > > > jumped out as interesting when I saw this: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 > > You have one mini review [1] say fixed and next comment say package > request has been approved. Don't forget now packages requests are > made directly with pkgdb [2] , so I think you are overreact , > especially if you look for emails. Package review is public and happens in the review bug. We also require (in the sense of having a strong custom, maybe even if it's not written anywhere explicitly), a checklist style review. This allows other people to know that not only the reviewer acked the package, but that they did it with enough diligence. There's no sign of the review process here. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
