On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 17:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of > > > "modules > > > like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share > > > in > > > common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way > > > there > > > won't be any serious dispute over? > > > > Maybe "packages needed to be able to to use and configure the > > default > > package manager". For example one might need to be able to adjust > > the > > dnf repo config to be able to actually install pkgs, if there is a > > restrictive firewall for example and only local mirrors are > > accessible > > or a proxy has to be used. > > I would say "packages needed to be able to install software and then > do > basic configuration of the system" - this would be: > > - $package_manager > - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_system_mo > dules.html > - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_files_mod > ules.html That seems viable, sure. +1. Would you like to add a comment in comps and update the group with the appropriate packages, or shall I? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
