On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:40:53PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > networkd+resolved is about 1MB, and more importantly, they do not > > bring in extra dependencies. We discussed also splitting that out on > > the upstream mailing list, but in the end the gain didn't seem important > > enough. > > From a cleanliness standpoint, it still makes sense to split it out. Also > because this is network-facing code and thus potentially security-relevant. It's not network facing code. It configures the network, but exits after applying the configuration, and does not listen for incoming packets. Also, unless you actually provide some configuration (*.network, *.netdev files), it doesn't do anything. I need something more convincing than general "cleanliness". systemd has many many binaries, and splitting each out into a seperate package without some noticable gain would be madness. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
