Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 12:08 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
>     In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group
> is
> aiming to deliver the Layered Image Build Service[0] to allow Fedora
> contributors to build containers images. In the first iteration of
> this we're targeting Docker layered image support. Part of this will
> be to allow Fedora contributors to maintain Dockerfiles much like we
> maintain rpm spec files via DistGit.
> 
> However we need to make a couple of decisions about naming
> conventions
> such that we can distinguish between rpms and container images as
> they
> are stored in Fedora DistGit. Also, alternatively we could setup a
> completely separate DistGit for container images that is disjoint
> from the one used for rpms. I would love feedback on everyone's
> preferences between those two options.

You could set it up in /srv/git/containers, in parallel to the current
/srv/git/rpms ?

That nicely avoids naming collisions.

It also should be quite asy now that dist-git is in ansible, you could
probably just factor out the path in the roles as a variable?

>     Cockpit's Dockerfile repo in DistGit would be stored with a
> leading special character:
>         fedpkg clone -cockpit

With the "-" as a leading character, you open yourself to nice errors
with the fact that it could be recognized as options. So you'd want to
type: fedpkg clone -- -cockpit

Alternatively, if you separate the two distgits, you could have a
fedcontainer tool, which would just be fedpkg but with its
configuration pointing to the container distgit, the container build
service, etc...

Or maybe just a: fedpkg --container clone cockpit ?

Most of the code (at least the one handling dist-git) could probably be
reused without any difference.

All in all, separating them seems much simpler to me.

You'd have a bit of work up front (to adapt the Ansible playbooks and
fedpkg slightly), but you pretty much avoid a whole class of issues
with naming collisions, cli options, and future surprises.


-- 
Mathieu
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux