Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
> Qt5 (Gui and Declarative) pretty much requires sse2, and I/kde-sig asked
> about pushing the minimum i686 fedora spec to include sse2, but fesco was
> against that idea at the time.

For what it's worth, I was against it. Using /usr/lib/sse2 as we do now 
works just fine as a solution to this problem. People without SSE2 at least 
get a distribution that works for them, and even Qt 5 builds (except the 
soon-to-be-packaged QtWebEngine module, sadly, unless/until something 
happens at its upstream to fix the V8 non-portability) that work, albeit 
slowly. LXQt should even work at an acceptable speed, given that they use 
QtWidgets for their UI, which does not need the QML 2 interpreter or JIT (so 
you don't get the non-JIT interpreter). And people with SSE2 get SSE2-
optimized .so binaries where it matters.

The only thing the duplication costs is some disk space, but that is the 
price of portability.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux