Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/15 07:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 10:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Germano Massullo wrote:
>>> For example, SSE3 instructions set is one of the minimum
>>> requirements and
>>> 99% of 32 bit only CPUs do not support it. Only Pentium 4 >= Prescott
>>> architecture supports it.
>>
>> I think building it with SSE3 is better than excluding the architecture
>> entirely. And FYI, requiring SSE3 is not really allowed even for
>> x86_64 (you
>> are allowed to assume only SSE2), so by that argument, there is no
>> architecture left.
> ACK. Does anybody know if there are any x86_64/64bit-CPUs which do not
> support sse3?
>
> I don't see sse3 in /proc/cpuinfo of any machine I have, but I also
> don't see any runtime error/warning from darktable.
>
>> Of course, a better solution would be to fix the package to work on
>> all CPUs
>> you support.
> ACK.
>
>> But if upstream doesn't care, it's going to be a problem. :-(
> Exactly - That's the actual problem. Upstream does not care and Fedora
> seems unable to address this issue.
>
> Ralf
>
According to my system, it has SSSE3. Is it SSE3?
Taken from A10-7400P laptop.

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux