On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 09:49 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > This policy is clearly sensible and necessary, no question about > that. > > But this appears to be an opportunity for improvement as well. > > Fortunately the breakage looks like it should be straight forward to > resolve but that obviously might not always be the case. > > For my part I wonder if getting advanced notice would have helped > because I'm not sure what the process is to properly work through a > staging environment and build test process. > > Going about it the long way could mean a week might not be long > enough. > > There must be a process that doesn't involve having to go through > quite > a bit of work on my local machine when that sort of infrastructure > should be available via the repository and build system or a > documented > process of steps for building locally. Well, see the last suggestion in my mail, about using COPR. http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
