Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I think that depends on whether you want to enable anything other than >> C(++), Python, and Fortran MPI packages (generally, not specifically in >> relation to the dependency stuff). I know I should have raised this >> before and probably somewhere else... > I suppose one could make the dependency generator more flexible by > having it determine whether a binary is mpi-enabled by simply > searching for a "/$MPI_NAME" component in its path and checking > whether it is linked against a libmpi.so. I meant the general support for other sorts of bindings. I.e. it doesn't seem as if I could get the R and Octave MPI packaging that I have into Fedora as things stand. If that is possible, I'm happy, but it would be good to have guidance on how. Otherwise I hope it helps to have an idea what needs to be fixed. Automation is good, and I assume there's no problem with extending it if there's a policy and general framework. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
