Re: Behavior differences between anaconda and "real" boot? (sata_nv problem)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger <fedora-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:29:48PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > So I was wondering what the issue could be. Some anaconda magic that the
> > installed system doesn't perform? Having an i686 kernel on that x86-64
> > machine and anaconda having yet another one?
> 
> I seem to recall that anaconda boots an i586 kernel.

Not for FC3; I can't boot the installer on an AMD K6-III (sigh).
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux