FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary arch at the time, in fact the RH build system couldn't get everything together and the ISOs were built on my home system. By FC2, this wasn't an issue anymore. I would not be surprised if the archives were a bit off as the official FC1 x86_64 was completed and pushed a bit after the official FC1 i686 release.
Justin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Gary Gatling <gsgatlin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I happened to notice last night that:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/x86_64/os/Fedora/RPMS/
seems very incomplete - it's like it's truncated, it has everything
alphabetically up to 'beecrypt' and nothing after. Compare to the i386
dir, which looks full:
I had problems with various things doing 64 bit installs from FC1-FC4 when I tried it a couple of years ago. But fedora 5 onward seemed to work ok for me. I have all the fedora releases in KVM vms in case I need to go back and look at stuff. I was able to do 32 bit installs of FC1-4. Its just the 64 bit parts that didn't seem to work for various reasons IIRC. From fedora 5 to present I was able to make 32 and 64 bit vms. But then again maybe I just wasn't trying hard enough with those very early releases.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
