Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:33:38 +0200
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There were filed and "fixed" exactly the opposite Bugs, to switch
> from NVRA to the FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e style:
> 	RFE: use update alias/updateid instead of update title in
> methods https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/186
> 	URLs should use update ID not title
> 	https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/221
> 
> So I am not going to fight it back.  But I have found - despite such
> URL is not listed anywhere - one can still use the NVRA.  So these
> URLs are the same:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.9.1-20.fc22

Right as is: 

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e/anything-at-all

So, when posting a list of bodhi urls, it's best IMHO to use: 

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/$UPDATEID/$packagenames

so people can see what packages are mentioned. 

The updates-testing report already does this.

kevin

Attachment: pgp9pY7mfYegG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux