Dne 9.10.2015 v 17:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:05:00 +0200 > Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This does not scale unfortunately ... and it is common excuse to not >> support it properly. IOW, I want to have package foo-1.0 installed >> side by side with foo-2.0 and I don't want to have foo1-1.0 side by >> side with foo-2.0. And this applies especially for packages which are >> designed to not conflict by design. > Of course it doesn't scale... unless someone has figured out some magic > dust to make software bug free and always secure and always integrated, > there needs to be people supporting all those parallel installed things > and making sure they are secure/bugfixed/integrated. I am commited to maintain several versions of key ruby packages, but there is no infrastructure in place! Let me clarify: 1) I want to maintain them in single repository. 2) I want to be able to specify upgrade path. Non of this is supported and as long as this is not supported, I am not willing to maintaine foo-2.0 and foo1-1.0 packages. > > So, the barrier is then that if you need/want a compat package, you > must commit to maintaining it, or convince someone else to. > I don't want to have compat package! Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
