Adam Jackson wrote: > Bundling is _not_ intrinsically poor practice. Firefox is a good > example of this, Firefox is exactly an example of how NOT to do things, and I'm fed up of it getting a blanket exception to our packaging guidelines. And now the "fix" is to simply remove the guideline for all packages. :-( I haven't checked recently, but last I checked, Debian unbundled a lot more libraries from Firefox than we did, even where upstream explicitly "did not allow" it. (They opted to not use the trademark anyway, so they are only bound by the Free Software license, that of course allows unbundling whatever they want.) One example is libpng, where Firefox requires the non- upstream APNG patch. Debian simply ripped out APNG support from Iceweasel to build it against the system libpng. (Though in this case, IMHO, the best fix would be to simply apply the APNG patch to the system libpng and ignore the libpng upstream's opinion. Then all browsers could benefit from APNG support. Some distros do that, too.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct