On 10/09/2015 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 18:46 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> On 10/09/2015 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 12:17 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: >>>> No missing expected images. >>>> >>>> Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151008: >>>> >>>> Cloud docker x86_64 >>>> >>>> Images in 23 Branched 20151008 but not this: >>>> >>>> Workstation disk raw armhfp >>>> >>>> Failed openQA tests: 48 of 52 >>> >>> It looks like GTK+ rendering changed somehow between 2015-10-08 and >>> 2015-10-09, which has broken almost all the tests. Looks like DPI >>> settings again, perhaps. I'm investigating. >> >> Might be due to the Cantarell font update that landed in stable last >> night. > > Yep, that certainly looks like the cause. Apparently Cantarell just > changes its appearance massively between apparently-minor releases? Yes, quite a lot of changes there. :( I'll double check with upstream how it should work with F23 and what version we should be using. I suspect there might be a follow up 0.0.18 release for GNOME 3.18.1 next week that fixes up a few things. > Seems like someone's cheerily messing with it post-0.0.17 too: > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/cantarell-fonts/commit/?id=bc8d06a18fd40ef50b5dee3e4d1c7580b7e08947 This commit should be just a fixup to a minor glitch that appeared in 0.0.17. > I'm no font expert, but is this normal practice? I can't think of any > other fonts that just change their metrics whenever they feel like > it... Most fonts are just zip files thrown over the wall and never updated again. I think this is one of the few fonts that gets active development. Having said that, I am not sure if all those changes in 0.0.17 were intended, I'm no font expert either :) -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
