On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After reading these emails the last few weeks, I believe FESCo should be commended. This was just going to turn intoOn 10/09/2015 03:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:50:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:Do I have to pronouce the obivious? FESCO to revert their faulty decision.
This opens the door to all kinds of duplication, waste of disk space, wasteI agree - the new wording does appear to give in to poor programming
of RAM, symbol conflicts and unfixed security issues!
practices.
Do you have suggestions for improvements?
an endless morass - so they stepped in and took the pragmatic approach. That is what leadership is all about. Time to move on.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
