On Friday, 09 October 2015 at 00:14, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 10/08/2015 08:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: > [snip] > >Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a perfect > >solution, and we''ll gladly review any proposals to improve this > >policy. But we can keep discussing this for years, or try to solve > >this issue incrementally. We chose the latter. > [snip] > > Replying to highlight this piece. The passed proposal is an improvement: it > opens Fedora to more participants, it better reflects some upstream > realities, and best of all it can be further amended. As people have the > time and inclination they can and should propose further improvements- Fesco > is clearly open to and expecting this, so if you have an idea on how to > further improve the bundling policies, please propose it. In this way > Fedora gets better and better over time. Forgive me the analogy, but to me it looked like this: Some vocal people don't like this old scary building we have. Let's destroy the building completely, put up a nicely painted shed in its place and hope someone will "improve it". I believe it would've been easier to renovate the old building than to rebuild everything from the ground up. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
