On 10/08/2015 07:11 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:56:53PM +0000, opensource@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.
iipsrv (maintained by: trasher)
iipsrv-1.0.0-4.0.git2431b45.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon
ipsilon (maintained by: puiterwijk, simo)
ipsilon-base-1.1.0-1.fc24.noarch requires /usr/sbin/restorecon
ladvd (maintained by: ixs, ttorcz)
ladvd-selinux-1.1.0-4.fc24.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon, /usr/sbin/semodule
ocp (maintained by: cra)
ocp-0.1.22-0.6.20150224gita07bf5d.fc23.i686 requires /sbin/restorecon
ocsinventory (maintained by: remi, xavierb)
ocsinventory-reports-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires /sbin/restorecon
ocsinventory-server-2.1.2-6.fc23.noarch requires /sbin/restorecon
So what is correct requires nowadays? /usr/sbin/restorecon? Something else?
Both should work.
/usr/sbin/restorecon is a file-provides of the policycoreutils package
and
/sbin/restorecon is an explicit provides of the policycoreutils package
# rpm -qlp policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \
| grep sbin/restorecon
...
/usr/sbin/restorecon
# rpm -q --provides -p policycoreutils-2.4-13.fc24.x86_64.rpm \
| grep sbin/restorecon
...
/sbin/restorecon
=> Likely, something is broken with the depchecker used to generated the
reports above.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
