On 7 October 2015 at 16:41, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> So the next step after that is that we reward people who lower a >> package's point. Good idea Kevin. > > "Reward" how? > I was thinking of cookies, but I expect that some sort of system could be put in place that would help promote moving stuff to less bundling. Now I understand the whole just use a whip to beat the supposed packagers into line bit. I don't agree with it, but I can understand it. I just think that sometimes you need to use a carrot to get the mule to walk. > There shouldn't be any need for special rewards for a packager just doing > his/her job, instead, those who don't do it shouldn't be allowed to be > packagers. > > The current situation with packages stuck in the review queue forever, > exception requests to FPC skyrocketing, etc. is the result of rampant > packager laziness. > > Kevin Kofler > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
