On 10/05/2015 05:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 5.10.2015 v 17:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): >> On 10/05/2015 04:52 PM, Martin Gansser wrote: >>> Hi Kalev, >>> >>> >>> >>> i am the packager of the package vdr-live (martinkg). >>> >>> >>> >>> vdr-live has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: >>> On x86_64: >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires >>> libtntnet.so.12()(64bit) >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.x86_64 requires >>> libcxxtools.so.9()(64bit) >>> On i386: >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libtntnet.so.12 >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.i686 requires libcxxtools.so.9 >>> On armhfp: >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libtntnet.so.12 >>> vdr-live-0.3.0-21.20150213git6ea279a.fc23.armv7hl requires libcxxtools.so.9 >>> Please resolve this as soon as possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> vdr-live depends on the 2 packages >>> >>> tntnet-2.3rc1-1.fc23 >>> <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=669021> >>> >>> cxxtools-2.3rc1-1.fc23 >>> <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=668281> >>> >>> >>> >>> can you please delete this 2 packages, because there is no vdr-live >>> package available that compiles against the new tntnet/cxxtools-2.3 version, >>> >>> but vdr-live compiles fine against tntnet/cxxtools-2.2. >> Hi Martin, >> >> It's actually self-service if you want to do it yourself before the cut >> off date: >> >> fedpkg retire "Reasons for retirement here" >> >> ... and repeat it on both f23 and master branches. >> > > I don't think he want's to retire the packages, but revert from 2.3rc1 > back to 2.2 .... this is possible but it will need epoch bump ... but I > might be wrong in interpretation :) Ahh yes, right you are. I totally misunderstood the question. Martin (added you back to CC as you don't seem to be subscribed to the devel list) -- if you want to avoid retiring vdr-live, epoch bumping tntnet and cxxtools back to 2.2 sounds about right to me too, especially given that they only appear to be used by vdr-live. Bumping the Epoch tag to 1 in a spec file would make rpm consider 2.2 newer than 2.3rc1, so that you can submit the "newer" 1:2.2 as a F23 update that correctly replaces the "older" 0:2.3rc1 build. -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
