Sean Middleditch wrote: > > The problem you're perceiving (slow operation as yum starts up) isn't at > all due to lack of caching, but perhaps very inefficient handling of the > cache - a lot of data has to be parsed and such, when it could perhaps > be stored in a more ready-to-process format. It takes *nearly a minute* to do that! I'm on a 2GHz machine. If it's not hitting the net, what's it doing, raytracing? -- Jamie Zawinski jwz@xxxxxxx http://www.jwz.org/ jwz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.dnalounge.com/ http://jwz.livejournal.com/