On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 27.09.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: >> >> This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely broken". >> It >> may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in Bugzilla. >> >> >> a package manager which pretends "nothing to do" after rm -rf >> /var/cache/dnf/* while there are two fresh builds is by definition >> broken >> >> My question to you is... why are you doing "rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*"? >> Why not just do "sudo dnf <action> --refresh"? That forces DNF to >> actually look at everything again. If your goal is to clean everything >> out, then "sudo dnf clean all" would do the trick too (which also worked >> in the yum days) > > > how often do you ask that question again? > > a empty "/var/cache/yum|dnf" is a by definition and unconditional empty > cache - why should i trust a software obviously not working with the basic > commands right in case of other ones? > > and BTW we are not a Ubuntu - what's up with all that "sudo" stuff - if i am > root then i am root, that's it > This is unnecessarily combative and derogatory to a fellow distribution, why are you going out of your way to be mean spirited? Thanks, Josef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
