On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 04:05:26 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> > [trustedqsl] > >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.i686 requires tqsllib(x86-32) = > >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23 > >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.x86_64 requires tqsllib(x86-64) = > >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23 > > > > > > This is due to the fact that upstream puts both the application and library > > in the same source archive but they have different versions AND that no one > > reads the comments in the spec file which tells you to bump the library rev. > > I was waiting for the rebuilds to stop before fixing, I guess it's time. > > Why does the app care about the RPM revisions, surely that should be a > dep on the exact version of the library alone. Well, it's a standard Base Package Requires adhering to the packaging guidelines. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
