Re: First packaging attempt : atmel-firmware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 17:46 -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:22:43PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > I'd recommend at76c50x-firmware, instead.
> 
> If you are only included the pcmcia/cf firmware in the package make it
> explicitly at76c50x-pcmcia-firmware as there are USB ones that need firmware
> sets too and I'm under the impression the firmware is different

Actually, not knowing enough about drivers to be sure, I think my
particular device is fully Free!

The .c file for my particular driver says:

* This driver contains code specific to Atmel AT76C505A (USB wireless
802.11)
* devices which use radio chips from RF Micro Devices (RFMD).  Almost
* all of the actual driver is handled by the generic at76c503.c module,
this
* file just registers for the USB ids and passes the correct firmware to
* at76c503.

Since I have a 505 I seem to be a happy camper! :)

It _was_ very hard to find a device like this, I returned about 3 cards
before finding one that seems to be fully Free.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux