On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 22:55 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > On Sep 23, 2015 10:37 PM, "Adam Williamson" <adamwill@fedoraproject.o > rg> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 15:42 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > > > Also is "--distro-sync --best" advised or not? The wiki only > > > listed > > > the > > > first part of that command, not those two additional flags. > > > > Well, last time I touched it, it recommended *trying* --best. You > > may > > have been looking at the 'upgrading with yum' page, which has > > different > > instructions. > > > > I was looking at the dnf system upgrade feature page, which still > recommends masking packagekit-offline-updates Yeah, change pages don't always get updated terribly quickly. Please consider https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade the 'official' page (as official as the wiki gets) and yell if anything on it is wrong. > Hmmm not what I thought it'd do. Im still trying to figure out why > system-upgrade left me with about a 1k post-upgrade updates to apply. Probably down to exactly the issue I mentioned. If you have third party repos enabled, particularly, there are several known chains that will lead to dnf-system-upgrade leaving huge numbers of packages out of the upgrade. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677 ;. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
