On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Matej Stuchlik <mstuchli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ville Skyttä" <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> >> >> Managed to fiddle around some more and looks like the above is a false >> concern, many *.pyc, *.opt-1.pyc and *.opt-2.pyc are identical. >> So, https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/16 > > Is it? See my next email, Python 3.5.0 RPM seems ~50% bigger right now, unless > I'm making some silly mistake, I don't think I've seen the email you refer to yet, nor do I have access to a Python 3.5.0 rpm -- where can I find one? Anyway I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of that difference is because rpmbuild's brp-hardlink-python only hardlinks pyc and pyo, not the new optimized files. The pull request I have open should address that. > and from what I see *.opt-2.pyc is nearly always different from the other ones. The only quick and silly test I did was to run rpmlint without any arguments using python3.5 binaries grabbed from an Arch Linux package, with -O and -OO. It failed early because not all required modules were available, but it generated pyc files for five modules: in three of them all pyc, opt-1.pyc and opt-2.pyc were identical, and in two pyc and opt-1.pyc were identical but opt-2.pyc differed. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
