On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 00:15 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:09:07PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I think that wrapping up ruby and python packages into rpms seems > > to be of > > dubious benefit. These projects have their own package management > > systems > > (that at least in ruby's case can handle multiple versions). I'm > > very much > > tempted to get out of the business of packaging these things and > > just let > > people use the upstream language tools. What does Fedora users > > gain with "dnf > > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" > > and "pip > > install ipython"? > > Not entirely on the topic but for pip we should for one recommend > using twine > instead of pip: > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/twine er...that doesn't sound anything like a pip alternative? "Currently it only supports uploading distributions." -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
