На 17.09.2015 в 12:26, Richard W.M. Jones написа:
As far as I can see most of them report "Partial RELRO" which may
well be fixed as you propose below. If not I can easily exclude
them.
They're intermediate files used by developers. They aren't runnable
binaries. I think everything in %{libdir}/ocaml should be ignored.
I see .o files, .so files and some .cmxs ones. Should all of them be ignored then ?
Looking at other replies on this thread it may even be better to focus only on
executable binaries and as Steve Grubb says this also may not be a big deal
after all.
--
Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
