Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



На 17.09.2015 в 06:28, Jerry James написа:
I am baffled as to why some of my packages show up on this list, as
they use %configure or invoke gcc with both $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and
$RPM_LD_FLAGS.  For example, memtailor, which I just built yesterday,
shows as lacking a canary, but it uses the %configure macro.  What is
going on there?


Probably because memtailor builds with -fstack-protector-strong, see previous message from Kaleb about this.

--
Alex

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux