On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:09:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> On 15/09/15 13:58 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> >I have been working on my first rpmbuild since quite a few days now. >> >> As a more gneral comment, why not try something *much* simpler for >> your first rpmbuild? >> >> Try something that doesn't use an alternative compiler, doesn't >> require lots of environment variables, and doesn't use a new spec file >> that has never been successfully tested. >> >> Maybe just take a working spec file for another project and run >> rpmbuild, and check the results. That would reveal if you're looking >> in the wrong place for the output, and you wouldn't waste time looking >> for problems in the spec file if you know the spec file is already >> correct. > > Also try --short-circuit builds for the individual %build and %install > sections. "rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit specfile" is extremely helpful > for debugging problems in %install and %files sections as it skips the > earlier successful %build stage. Building rpm step by step gave me the solution: $ rpmbuild -v -bc SPECS/R.spec /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-ip': not a valid identifier /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-ipo': not a valid identifier /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-opt-mem-layout-trans=3': not a valid identifier /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-xHost': not a valid identifier /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nTfP8D: line 58: export: `-mavx -fp-model precise -DMKL_ILP64 -qopenmp-parallel -I/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2016.0.109/linux/mkl/include': not a valid identifier My build flags were not correctly set. Then I kept on secion by section, with no errors. $ rpmbuild -v -ba SPECS/R.spec <----------BUILD----------------> Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/SRPMS/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.src.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-core-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-core-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-java-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-java-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-devel-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libRmath-static-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-debuginfo-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7bTCJ + umask 022 + cd /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd R-3.2.1 + /usr/bin/rm -rf /home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/R-3.2.1-mkl.fc22.x86_64 + exit 0 --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your interest in my issue and your patience. And please apologize for the "tons" of emails in an open source community mailing list ;-) Result is here. > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
