On 09/14/2015 11:40 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Dne 14.9.2015 v 23:10 Brendan Conoboy napsal(a):
/Then/ we could start thinking about /truly minimal/ concepts,
perhaps “container minimal” = “the minimal set needed to start and
run an executable dependent on Fedora ABI” (e.g. kernel version
requirement +glibc+locale data+Python 3 interpreter+…, useful for
building containers), “VM minimal” could be “the minimal contents of a
VM needed to start and run…” (e.g. kernel
implementation+init+container minimal, useful for single-app VM), “CLI
minimal”, …
Mirek
Right, so I don't think minimal is the end goal, I think the OS (not the
distribution) is the end goal- minimal is presumably a subset of the OS.
And how we call this "truly minimal concept"? Ring -1?
I would like to have those Rings zero based, where zero is absolute
minimum to run. Somewhere. Not necessary on bare metal.
The whole "OS" can be Ring 1. There is still plenty of numbers remaining.
How is this useful?
--
Brendan Conoboy / RHEL Development Coordinator / Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
