Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/07/2015 05:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 2.9.2015 v 20:59 Brendan Conoboy napsal(a):
5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary
package.  If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring
0, all sub-packages are in ring 0.

So we are going to include all those *-doc subpackages? And all languages bindings? E.g look at rpm subpackages.

Yes, this is a good question. Per elsewhere in the thread, it may make sense to have 2 composes: One for the bits that Requires can be satisfied, a second that requires outer rings to satisfy. It is a little messy though, and will require a more nuanced expression of rules for inputs and outputs.

--
Brendan Conoboy / RHEL Development Coordinator / Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux