Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/11/15, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ​I get the feeling this is related to Fedora not aggressively using
> versioned package names for libraries, or at least enabling some kind
> parallel installing capability. SUSE used to follow a policy similar to our
> current one, but switched due to the insanity and impracticality. Mageia
> also uses a policy almost identical to SUSE's.
>
> For an example, here's SUSE's policy:
> https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Shared_library_packaging_policy​;

Put it bluntly, OpenSUSE does this like a mess, with introducing more
and more packages instead of solving the problem. Initially copying
the idea from Debian, introducing libfoo2, libbar3, or whatever is
silly as well.
-- 

Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng

http://awk.io
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux