Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 11.9.2015 v 15:22 Eric Griffith napsal(a):

On Sep 11, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
 >
 > Dne 11.9.2015 v 14:46 Germano Massullo napsal(a):
 >
 > Fault #1
 > (I've already complained that usage of rawhide & rpmfusion is getting silly)
 >
 >
How is the usage getting silly? *genuinely confused* Id love for Fedora to
have everything in the repos (A la Arch) but for legal and philosophical
reasons it's not possible.

My complain here is about packaging libraries.
And just because a library has been upgraded from version .so.2 to version .so.4 and you can't have both (as the new one replaces old one by Fedora policy) - you cannot normally use rpmfusion.

The best part is - the library itself is mostly useless - but because of packaging policy - if you want to use rpmfusion - you have to basically build
lib-compat-like (Fedora way) libraries yourself - that's what I call silly....

It has absolutely nothing to do with any 'legal' issues...

Zdenek

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux