Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 19:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "AM" == Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> AM> I also like the proposal for the bundled(<libname>) macro
> definition
> AM> for tracking purposes.
> 
> Just a note that it isn't a proposal; that is the current requirement
> for anything which bundles things.
> 


Right, this is the current requirement for anything with a bundling
exception granted by FPC. If we adopted this high-level policy to skip
the exception process, that would (by the transitive property) make
this a requirement of all packages carrying known bundles.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux