Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 04:08 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>
>
>> Is the intention of your proposal to also allow Chromium into the main
>> Fedora repos?  I honestly can't tell where it draws the line.
>
>
> We have a long list of bundling exceptions in Fedora. I do not see much
> reasons why Chromium (or parts of it) could not be on this list.

I will be honest and say that I am very confused in your response
here.  The bundling Chromium does is much more extensive than
darktable, yet you believe Chromium can get an exception while denying
darktable?  That doesn't make sense to me.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux