On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.c > om> wrote: > > I assume that subject line got your attention. > > > Most definitely. :) > > So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper? Do you > have any proposals for enforcement? A periodic query of Provides > (bundled-foo) and a BZ requesting a review? Sometime projects > enable unbundling over time. > I don't know that enforcement is strictly necessary. Maintainers that care will self-enforce. Maintainers that don't care won't be aided by this. "Enforcement" implies adding more heavy process, which is part of the problem this is trying to avoid.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
