On 09/02/2015 06:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, I stumbled upon OPEN bugs [1] link on Upstream Release Monitoring > wiki page [2]. And the BZ/packages probably deserves cleanup. There are > several categories I identified as worrying: > > 1) Packages are retired but the bugs are kept open. For example: > > 2) Packages are not updated in ages, although newer version exists: > > 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open > > I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the > packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd > category should not be monitored anymore. Any thoughts? I agree with the first two. Need some criteria for how "ages" is defined though. As for 3, I have a couple packages that update frequently and I prefer to just leave the tracking bug open let it update, thus doing my part to preserve precious positive integers :). Perhaps adding the Tracking keyword could be helpful here somehow? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
