On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open
I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd category should not be monitored anymore. Any thoughts?
I would keep monitoring for 3) but close onesting bugs that are too old and were clearly forgotten. I prefer to be informed by the monitor script, even if I am a version behind :) I've also just now added comments for all my entries on why these are still not in CLOSED state. Paul
Vít [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&classification=Fedora&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Copendate&email1=upstream-release-monitoring%40fedoraproject.org&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=1733771&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=&query_format=advanced [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
