Re: when DEP-3 compliant patches in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 14:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I am opposed to any such scheme, because it means we could no longer
> produce 
> our patches with diff without hand-editing them.
> 
> Such information, if needed, belongs into specfile comments.

Let's do that then. openSUSE already has established required comments
for patches in specfiles: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Pa
tches_guidelines#Patch_markup_.28also_called_.22Tagging_patches.22.29

It works well in practice. It's not hard to write, and it more helpful
than the Fedora tradition of just adding a link to the upstream bug.
Maintainers in openSUSE understand that it is required.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux