On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:54:58 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Your script output does not tell anything at all about activity of all > > packagers in the package collection, in the normal review queue(s), in > > pkgdb. No clues about number of orphaned/retired packages. No clues about > > semi-dead packages where the packager is absent for a long time, and the > > package only gets rebuilt during mass-rebuilds or receives random rebuilds > > by other people. > > This is completely different sets of problems. It was you who mentioned: [1] https://eischmann.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/growth-of-fedora-repository-has-almost-stalled/ | Growth of Fedora Repository Has Almost Stalled | [...] the increase of number of packages in the official Fedora | repository has almost stalled: Is that blog post meant to be understood differently than I do? Is growth of the repository only linked to packagersponsors' activity? I don't think so. You cannot reduce the problem to only the needsponsor process. Lack of growth is due to various factors. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
