Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 21.08.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Orion Poplawski" <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 21 August, 2015 1:58:35 AM
Subject: Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On 08/20/2015 02:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

I was just watching the ongoing reports of want-to-be-contributors how hard
is to get sponsored; reports how Fedora
Repository stalled [1]; discussion that we actually do not know how many
active sponsors we have.
...

[1]
https://eischmann.wordpress.com/2015/07/27/growth-of-fedora-repository-has-almost-stalled/

My gut reaction to this is, my god, we don't need *more* packages in Fedora,
we need more people maintaining the pile we already have.  So I'd like to see
more packagers added as co-maintainers of packages.

+ 1 000 000 000 ........................

agreed - quality and maintainance matters, not having the largest repo with orphaned packages - there is no gain in get 10 new packages for F24 and get the orphaned and so tagged for removal notification a year later

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux