Re: Unable to submit update for F22 (was Re: bodhi 2 now live)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!

I assume you mean "bodhi" by "this". 

The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora, but are
also involved in other communities. When is a project "Fedora" ? 
There are other installs of bodhi out in the world (at least there
were) where we get contributions from. 

> One thing is the standards we require for being packaged in Fedora or
> used in Fedora infrastructure. Another is what we expect from our
> *own* projects. And there, requiring Fedora infrastructure to be used
> is very reasonable.

Well, I guess we will agree to disagree then. 

kevin

Attachment: pgp7XdRJ8PFmF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux