Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > * Matt opened a thread on the marketing list about renaming rawhide. It
> > sounds like most people would prefer us to make the changes first,
> > then and only then look at renaming.
>
> s/renaming/rebranding/
>
> I personally would prefer the name be preserved if at all possible, but if
> the marketing gurus feel otherwise, so be it.
Certainly agree with making the changes first - if a name has a bad
reputation because of how things have worked in the past, if you don't
fix those things, that reputation will just move right onto the new name...
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
One thing I would like to see is that Fedora's development code could reach a state where something like openSUSE's Tumbleweed would be possible. If we could take daily/weekly/biweekly snapshots of the repositories for people to use as a rolling release like the way the openSUSE folks are doing, I think that would go a long way to enabling a higher scale of testing of code that makes it into Fedora releases. I don't want use to let go of normal releases, but I feel that the people who want to have that "rolling" model should be able to from Fedora and expect a reasonable level of things working.
If we're able to do something like this, the "rawhide" name could certainly stay for the development code, but a new name for these snapshots would be appropriate.
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
