Le vendredi 17 dÃcembre 2004 Ã 19:33 -0500, Colin Walters a Ãcrit : > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 18:30 -0600, Satish Balay wrote: > > > I would sugest 'rpmbuild --rebuild bla.src.rpm' should work for > > users. i.e 'bla.spec' that gets into 'bla.src.rpm' should be a > > generated file based on all the data that can be automatically pulled > > from external sources. > > Absolutely agreed. The SRPM becomes a legacy format that should work > with legacy tools. Please don't. I can happily work with a few cds on SRPMS. I'll shot the first one that'll only suggest to replace it with a multi- cd cvs dump One of the foremost qualities of rpm is that a srpm is a simple archive of package root + patches + specfile. CVS is ok for people heavily involved in a project. For casual users, it can not replace a SRPM. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
