Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 19:39, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:01:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> > maybe you should have read the link below becaus ethen maybe you would 
> > not accuse him "about his attitude" - there is a lot of activity and 
> > fast respones - what else should he do?
> > 
> >  >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018
> 
> Well, how about working with the sponsor that added comment 19 in that ticket?

I am that sponsor. One of the submitted packages is quite complex, so it
should be understandable that it takes time to review and adapt the package
to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. The other hasn't seen a new comment
for only a week, so I really don't understand why Marcin threw the towel
already. 

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux