On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >>> I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. >> >> -1 >> There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least as long as others are active. >> If they would want, they can return any time they want. > > There is a problem though. It makes the sponsors list larger than it > actually is, and gives the impression that we have more people > available for sponsoring than we actually do. From a new packager > perspective, it is even more frustrating to see a larger list and > still have no sponsor. It also lends itself to those people being > contacted directly for sponsorship requests, which will then go > ungranted because they are not active sponsors. > > At the very least, we need to have a way to mark these people as > inactive so they are accurately reflected. > >> We should *not* be like turned down lover "If you leave me once, you are not welcome any more." > > I didn't say or suggest that they aren't welcome. I said we should > remove them from the sponsors list. Please do not elevate things to > hyperbole. > >> And as I said previously, the knowledge you proven to have as sponsor does not disappear. The guidelines does not change >> too much. You can refresh your knowledge in few hours. > > Correct. However, if they return it should be as simple and quick to > get them granted access again. +1 to what Josh said above. Regards, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
