Dne 15.8.2015 v 20:09 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > H> Using Bugzilla rather than FAS is not a bad idea, as some people > H> abuse their sponsor status by blindly adding people into the packager > H> group without any supervision. Using FAS as the information source > H> would just hide this hideous behaviour. > > I don't know if this has changed in he new age of having crazy human > coding machines, but the last time i looked it was extremely difficult > to see someone's sponsor and to generate statistics on sponsorship > activities. I had some tooling a very long time ago which was used to > stir up a whole pile of flames surrounding the handling of inactive > sponsors. Although I think too, that right way is to sponsor somebody via Package Review, I enhanced my script to show direct sponsorship - which means that this information is available in FAS :) Mind that this information is not (yet?) linked to that BZ reviews, so I show BZ reviews *and* independently sponsorship in FAS. Without information if this was result of some Package Review. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct